In the event the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only completed When the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence as well as petitioner company responded to your allegations as such they were perfectly mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use being seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Case regulation is specific to the jurisdiction in which it was rendered. As an illustration, a ruling in a very California appellate court would not ordinarily be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Stacy, a tenant inside of a duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he experienced not offered her more than enough notice before raising her rent, citing a whole new state legislation that requires a minimum of ninety days’ notice. Martin argues that the new regulation applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.
If the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is usually only done Should the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence along with the petitioner company responded towards the allegations therefore they were effectively aware of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to become appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed to your disposal of the instant petition over the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner as well as private respondents and will acquire care of each of the components of the case and be certain that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
Generally speaking, higher courts usually do not have direct oversight over the decrease courts of record, in that they cannot arrive at out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments in the decrease courts.
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice in the Peace u/s 22-A isn't obliged to afford a possibility of hearing to your accused party; nor obliged to always or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to look at all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a number of the relevant factors. Read more
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) website Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it is practical for any Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to make an attempt to get rid of a case on advantage and more importantly when after recording of evidence it has achieved to some stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for benefit disposal when it's got achieved this kind of stage. Read more
10. Without touching the merits in the case with the issue of yearly increases while in the pensionary emoluments with the petitioner, in terms of policy decision in the provincial government, these once-a-year increase, if permissible within the case of employees of KMC, needs further assessment being made by the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a result of funding issues and insufficient adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, necessitating the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
Summaries offer concise explanations of legal principles and significant cases pertaining to land ownership, real estate transactions, property rights, and related matters, helping you in understanding the intricacies of land and property law.
For that reason, this petition is hereby disposed of while in the terms stated previously mentioned. However no harassment shall be caused to either party and also the case shall be decided because of the competent court of legislation if pending. Read more
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar challenge. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in applying the regulation. This example of case law refers to two cases heard in the state court, in the same level.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the opportunity to review both the precedent as well as the case under appeal, Maybe overruling the previous case law by setting a brand new precedent of higher authority. This might take place several times as being the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first of your High Court of Justice, later on the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his advancement in the concept of estoppel starting in the High Trees case.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” usually are not binding, but may very well be used as persuasive authority, which is to give substance on the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.